Not only does an obituary provide an event to celebrate achievements of a life but it also provides an excuse to recall amusing anecdotes that say as much about the person as any list of major accomplishments is able to do. Ian Masser was one whose dry sense of humour enabled him to tell great stories about his experiences and keep the listener listening. When he was appointed to the Chair of Planning in the Univers
ity of Utrecht in 1974, he recounted to me the tale of how he got his PhD. He said to me, and I summarise, that when the Chair was advertised, he reasoned that he would never get such a Chair in his own department in the University of Liverpool so he thought he would chance his arm and apply for the position in Utrecht. He said he knew the Chair had been designed for someone else but that someone else did not want the job and that is why he thought he might have a chance. A realist for all seasons was Ian. He was duly interviewed and offered the Chair. He then returned to Liverpool to begin his move. However a few weeks later, he received a letter asking him whether he had a PhD. He did not have one because in those far away days, many people in planning did not have such a qualification largely because planning was still a quite strongly professional subject area, so he replied saying he did not.
A few weeks went by and he received another letter asking him whether he could get one – a PhD, because in the Netherlands professors had some sort of higher degree, the particular form of which was lost on we British. And it was clear the authorities in the Netherlands didn’t understand the British University system either. In those days, there was no email and the telephones didn’t work that well and what complicated matters was that at every stage of the process of appointment, the position and the candidate had to be checked by the Palace in Amsterdam. The appointment had to be signed off by the Head of State. So as Ian recounted it to me, once a letter came to Liverpool, the reply was sent back to Queen Juliana of the Netherlands for approval. As Ian wryly joked, a messenger bearing the royal seal was involved at every stage, a soldier on horseback! When Ian received the letter more or less suggesting that he acquire a PhD, he replied saying he thought he could do so. This to most Brits was then truly amazing. In fact in only about 6 UK universities in those days, could you get a PhD by submission of publications and Liverpool was one such place. So he set about putting his publications together and binding them into a coherent bundle, submitting the material, which was duly examined, gaining the coveted degree. At this point, a year had elapsed from the time he had been offered the job but when he then took up his post, he found out that he was supposed to teach in Dutch by the time the year ended. In fact he painfully struggled with courses while his wife picked up the language in five minutes in the supermarket (Liverpudlian’s are great linguists!). I am sure the stories are apocryphal but Ian’s experience of getting a PhD later in life was not so unusual as this obituarist well knows. I did the same at Cardiff in the early 1980s although I had to go through the real motions and register formally. Ian of course was one of my external examiners.
There is much about Ian that I could tell you of his career but Peter Brown who has penned some personal reflections following this will say more. I first met Ian in the University of Manchester in the Department of Town and Country Planning in 1967 where a small workshop was being convened on new techniques in planning. Ian was then a Lecturer in Civic Design in the University of Liverpool and I a Studio Assistant with duties in project teaching Both of us however saw our main focus on the development of computer models of land use and transport which were taking the planning world by storm in the 1960s. This was the decade of the systems approach, the time when planning threw off its mantle of the bureaucracy that had fashioned a planning system based largely on aesthetic design to one which began to think of cities and their planning as systems to be controlled. Models were central to this focus and as soon as we met, Ian and myself became kindred spirits in the advance of this cause. In that year, he suggested that we offer a short course on what urban land use transport models could do and he set up a series of three evening talks in Liverpool in the School of Civic Design where we both laid out what this new focus was all about. He produced the lecture notes for this which gained quite wide circulation at the time. In fact he was the first to produce a small textbook called Analytical Models for Urban and Regional Planning (1972) that established the work of the group he was building up at Liverpool (and which has continued there in various guises ever since).
Ian’s research then began to move from models to data and he really spent the rest of his life dealing with data and spatial infrastructure to enable planners to use different data. He moved from Utrecht back to the Chair of Planning at Sheffield University in 1978 where he was Head of Department for some years. In the 1980s, he became increasingly interested in data, first becoming coordinator of the ERSC Regional Research Labs (RRLs) Initiative which then seamlessly morphed into the European Science Foundation GISDATA project (Geographic Information Systems + Data) which brought together a network of centres. He worked with Max Craglia on this project and although I did not know him so well at Sheffield – I moved to the US in 1990 – we collaborated between the SUNY-Buffalo site of the NCGIA I was directing there (the National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis) and the ESRC’s RRL and then GISDATA projects. Ultimately this collaboration was to lead to the Vespucci summer school lectures held In Florence in the 2000s. On the back of GISDATA, Ian was responsible for forming the European network of GIS centres called AGILE and he was also instrumental in supporting the AGI in building a robust organisation. Peter Brown talks a little of this below but Ian moved back to Holland in 1998 to run the planni
It is easy to forget that Ian was first and foremost trained in planning at a time when our views about cities were not particularly abstract but nevertheless highly visual. His early papers in the Town Planning Review, the first of which was on village design in metropolitan hinterlands in 1965, indicate his broad perspective on planning and design. When we cooperated in the 1970s on papers, we both expected our work to be useful to planners, notwithstanding the enormous challenges in translating this kind of knowledge into planning practice. This was a central theme in Ian’s long standing contributions and I will remember his patience and perspicuity in dealing with the challenges of building a more scientific approach into how we need to make our cities more sustainable and liveable.ng school at ICT from which he retired in the early 2003. Ian spent a lot of time in his later years working with spatial data infrastructure producing an influential and cogent paper with Michael Wegener in 2016 in this journal “Brave New GIS Worlds Revisited”, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Vol. 43(6), 1155–1161 which looked back 20 years to 1996 at which time GIS was focussing on spatial data infrastructure much of which has now been built. His last book Building European Spatial Data Infrastructures (Esri Press, 2015) as as good a summary of this perspective on the field of spatial infrastructure as you will find.
Michael Batty, University College London
Dear RSAI members,
I hope this email finds you well.
I am writing you as the 13th World Congress just opened (yesterday) with an intense first day, packed with two excellent keynote lectures and 35 sessions, including both regular, national, and special ones. To this starter we are adding today a first dish with 40 more sessions, another much expected Keynote Speech, by Prof. Siqi Zheng (MIT), and a full day of Regional Science Avademy activities. I hope those of you who decided to join the congress will have as much interest in these events as I personally had throughout yesterday.
I am also happy to take the chance to send you the May 2021 issue of the RSAI newsletter (download), as usual skillfully edited by Prof. Martijn Smit (University of Utrecht). Martijn is seeking a second pair of eyes to help with both the gathering of contributions, and the proofreading of the final product. Applications from the global South or from those with a good range of contacts there would be particularly welcome, as would being a native speaker of English. Please contact Martijn at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. within Friday 23 July 2021 if you’re interested, enclosing a CV and a half-page statement of purpose, indicating why you feel you’re a good fit for editing the newsletter and how involved you have been and plan to be in RSAI and its activities.
To all members, a very fine day; and to the World Congress participants, best wishes of an interesting day, with lots of learning and interactions.
Kind regards,
Andrea Caragliu
Associate Professor of Regional and Urban Economics
Politecnico di Milano, ABC Department
RSAI Executive Director
It is a pleasure to inform you that the issue n. 58 (May 2021) of the journal Revista Portuguesa de Estudos Regionais / Portuguese Review of Regional Studies is now available online. You can accede to it using the following link:
http://www.apdr.pt/siteRPER/EN/revistaEN.html
Articles
The Recreational Value of Azibo Beaches: A Case Study in the Interior North of Portugal
João Oliveira Soares, Filipa Coutinho Soares
The Implementation of an Online Ticket Platform as a Cultural Management Strategy
Cidália Oliveira, Gonçalo Vieira Castro, Carmem Leal, Rui Silva
Dimensões da Universidade Empreendedora e o Seu Papel na Perceção de Competitividade Regional
Gonçalo Rodrigues Brás, Miguel Torres Preto, Ana Dias Daniel, Aurora Amélia Castro Teixeira
Impacto Económico do Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal na Região
Pedro Miguel de Jesus Calado Dominguinhos, Sandra Cristina Dias Nunes, Sandrina Berthault Moreira, Raquel Ferreira Pereira
Dificuldades da Gestão Urbana Integrada: O Caso do Parque das Nações na Perspetiva dos Utilizadores
Rita Ferreira Domingues, Paulo Castro Seixas, Ricardo Cunha Dias
O Contributo da Lei de Cotas na Redução das Desigualdades Sociais
Fernando Gonçalves, Susana Bernardino
O Estado da Bahia na Recessão: Uma Análise Shift-Share Multifatorial dos Municípios Entre 2014 e 2017
Thiago Henrique Carneiro Rios Lopes, Luiz Carlos de Santana Ribeiro
The North of Portugal and Galicia: Evidence of Agglomeration of Economic Activity
Vítor João Pereira Domingues Martinho, Jesyca Salgado Barandela
Call for papers - extended deadline
The 17th PRSCO Summer Institute
Online meeting, 11-13 August 2021, hosted by RMIT University Vietnam
https://www.rmit.edu.vn/17th-prsco-summer-institute
The deadline for full paper submission is extended by 21 June 2021.
Please find an attached file.
Best regards,
Hiroyuki Shibusawa
PRSCO Executive Secretary
|
The access link to the Zoom Room is: https://pucrs.zoom.us/j/99715232314?pwd=YndEaU53WTNwcFFhVEV6VGtIVEhlQT09
We invite abstract submissions for the IHS Financing Urban Resilience through Land Value Capture Conference. IHS invites you to review the collection of themes below and submit your abstract to your preferred theme. Any contribution is welcome, including abstracts of case studies, research, or opinion pieces.
Submission details should include:
Important! Abstracts should be submitted by 15th May 2021, in English. Please submit your abstract to Ms. Francesca Vanelli (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.).
IHS will review all submissions and will notify on acceptance of abstracts by the end of May. Please note that the conference will be hosted online.
More details at: https://www.ihs.nl/en/news/call-abstracts-financing-urban-resilience-through-land-value-capture
Regional Science Policy & Practice Pages: 207-435 April 2021 Issue Edited by: Eveline S. van Leeuwen, Solmaria Halleck Vega |
ISSUE INFORMATION
Free Access
Pages: 207-208 | First Published: 23 April 2021
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Open Access
Voting and the rise of populism: Spatial perspectives and applications across Europe
Eveline S. van Leeuwen, Solmaria Halleck Vega
Pages: 209-219 | First Published: 02 April 2021
Open Access
Luise Koeppen, Dimitris Ballas, Arjen Edzes, Sierdjan Koster
Pages: 221-245 | First Published: 17 December 2020
Voting with your feet or voting for Brexit: The tale of those stuck behind
Annie Tubadji, Thomas Colwill, Don Webber
Pages: 247-277 | First Published: 28 December 2020
Open Access
Does population decline lead to a “populist voting mark‐up”? A case study of the Netherlands
Eveline S. van Leeuwen, Solmaria Halleck Vega, Vera Hogenboom
Pages: 279-301 | First Published: 16 October 2020
EU integration, regional development problems and the rise of the new radical right in Slovakia
Štefan Rehák, Oliver Rafaj, Tomáš Černěnko
Pages: 303-321 | First Published: 23 December 2020
Determinants of regional distribution of AKP votes: Analysis of post‐2002 parliamentary elections
Pinar Deniz, Burhan Can Karahasan, Mehmet Pinar
Pages: 323-352 | First Published: 11 December 2020
The role of economic and cultural changes in the rise of far‐right in Greece: A regional analysis
Panagiotis Artelaris, George Mavrommatis
Pages: 353-369 | First Published: 24 January 2021
Italian discontent and right‐wing populism: determinants, geographies, patterns
Dante Di Matteo, Ilaria Mariotti
Pages: 371-396 | First Published: 15 September 2020
Alessandra Faggian, Marco Modica, Félix Modrego, Giulia Urso
Pages: 397-413 | First Published: 05 January 2021
From Chianti to the Apennines: The fall of the left‐wing parties' predominance in Tuscany
Francesco G. Truglia, Alessandro Zeli
Pages: 415-435 | First Published: 15 September 2020
|
|
||||
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||
|
|
Dear colleagues,
We invite you to visit the website of the XLVI International Conference on Regional Science. To send and manage abstracts, you must register in advance (link). If you were already registered from previous years, it is not necessary for you to register again, but it is necessary that you enter with your email and password in this link. If you do not remember your email and password, put your email here and you will receive a message to recover your password.
In this link you can find the models of: normal abstract, expanded abstract, paper and poster.
You can now incorporate your documents, the deadline is june, 1st.
We are looking forward to see you in Madrid.
Organizing Committee
The Regional Science Association International (RSAI), founded in 1954, is an international community of scholars interested in the regional impacts of national or global processes of economic and social change.